Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM23550 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a lot better than Micromax MAd A94, with a general score of 80 against 47.3. The Google Pixel 3 features a greater hardware performance than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, a bigger screen and a much higher amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 3 shoots way better pictures and videos than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a much higher 12.2 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much better video resolution. The Google Pixel 3 features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Micromax MAd A94, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 60 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a really longer battery duration than Micromax MAd A94, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity against 1800mAh.
Google Pixel 3 costs a bit more money than the Micromax MAd A94, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.