Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 47.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Motorola |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| -- | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM23550 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 150 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is a lot better than the Micromax MAd A94, having a 76.4 score against 47.3. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version and Micromax MAd A94 has Android 4.2.2 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a better CPU than Micromax MAd A94, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has an extra GPU and a larger amount of RAM. Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better screen than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a way better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, a way better number of pixels per display inch and a larger screen.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a greater camera than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a camera with a much higher 20.7 megapixels resolution and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Micromax MAd A94, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 28 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way better battery duration than Micromax MAd A94, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 1800mAh.
Motorola DROID Turbo is a little more expensive than the Micromax MAd A94, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.