Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM23550 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is way better than Micromax MAd A94's general score of 47.3. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a superior hardware performance than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Galaxy S9 has a more vivid screen than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a larger display, a way better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a much better count of pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much better memory for games and applications than Micromax MAd A94, because it has 60 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 400 GB. The Galaxy S9 features a way better camera than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a way better battery life than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Galaxy S9 costs a bit more than the Micromax MAd A94, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.