Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.3 | 51.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | ZTE |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| -- | 2017-09-19 |
| -- | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 5.00 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| $ 155.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 218 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM23550 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Battery | 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 150 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Tempo X is just a bit better than Micromax MAd A94, having a overall score of 51.7 against 47.3. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the ZTE Tempo X has 7.1 Nougat version and Micromax MAd A94 has Android 4.2.2, offering some additional features. The ZTE Tempo X's CPU is very similar to Micromax MAd A94's processor, and although the ZTE Tempo X has 512 MB more RAM, they both have a Quad-Core processor.
The Micromax MAd A94 features a better screen than ZTE Tempo X, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 854 x 480 pixels, the Micromax MAd A94 also counts with a little bit higher pixels quantity in each display inch. ZTE Tempo X has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Micromax MAd A94, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo X also has 4 GB more internal memory.
Micromax MAd A94 shoots better videos and photos than ZTE Tempo X. Both have a back facing camera with a 5 mega-pixels, the same 1280x720 (HD) video quality and the same video frame rate. The ZTE Tempo X counts with greater battery duration than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a 2200mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, ZTE Tempo X is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.