Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.74 x 2.49 x 0.42 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.51 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Orange | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8212 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 456 hours standby time 12.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than Lumia 430, with an 81.3 score against 57.4. The LG V35 ThinQ design is thinner but heavier than the Lumia 430. LG V35 ThinQ has a superior processing unit than Lumia 430, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than Lumia 430, because it has a lot bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a much greater pixels number per inch of screen. LG V35 ThinQ captures much better photographs and videos than Lumia 430, because it has a much larger diafragm aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a lot larger back camera sensor taking way better quality pictures.
LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Microsoft Lumia 430, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery performance than Microsoft Lumia 430, because it has a 120 percent more battery size.
LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than the Lumia 430, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.