Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | -- |
| 2015-01-14 | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.65 x 2.55 x 0.46 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 36.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 800 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1560mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is much better than the Microsoft Lumia 435, with an 81.6 score against 57.8. The Google Pixel 2 body is a lot newer and noticeably thinner than Microsoft Lumia 435's, but it is a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better screen than Microsoft Lumia 435, because it has a much greater amount of pixels per inch in the display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a larger screen.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a quite superior processing power than Lumia 435, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and 6 more processing cores. Google Pixel 2 counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Lumia 435, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Google Pixel 2 features a way better battery life than Lumia 435, because it has a 2700mAh battery size instead of 1560mAh. The Google Pixel 2 takes greater videos and photos than Lumia 435, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality, a lot bigger aperture for better photography in low-light environments, a way better video definition and a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 2 is also cheaper than the Lumia 435, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.