Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.68 x 2.58 x 0.46 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.81 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8212 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1560mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than Microsoft Lumia 532's 58.5 overall score. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with Android 10 OS, while Microsoft Lumia 532 works with Windows Phone 8.1 OS. The LG V50 ThinQ body is notably thinner but notably heavier than the Microsoft Lumia 532.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a better display than Lumia 532, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a really bigger display and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen. LG V50 ThinQ has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Microsoft Lumia 532, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 120 GB more internal storage capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a greater performance than Microsoft Lumia 532, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and more RAM. LG V50 ThinQ has a much longer battery duration than Lumia 532, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Microsoft Lumia 532, because it has a much bigger aperture to capture better low light photos, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the Lumia 532, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.