Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the Lumia 950 XL, with a general score of 83.7 against 75. LG V50 ThinQ counts with Android 10 operating system, and Lumia 950 XL has Windows 10 Mobile operating system. LG V50 ThinQ's design is way newer than Lumia 950 XL's, although it is just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a more powerful processing unit than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Lumia 950 XL has a little bit better looking display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a just a bit inferior pixel amount in each inch in the screen, a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Lumia 950 XL counts with just a bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse video frame rates and a way smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same video definition, the Lumia 950 XL also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a much higher 20 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
LG V50 ThinQ has longer battery performance than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3340mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.