Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android |
| 2015-10-06 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 515 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is better than the Lumia 950 XL, with an 84.7 score against 75. Galaxy A32's design is noticeably newer than the Lumia 950 XL's, although it's somewhat thicker and heavier. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, and Lumia 950 XL comes with Windows 10 Mobile OS. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features just a little better hardware performance than Lumia 950 XL, because it has 1 GB more RAM and a higher number of 2 gigahertz cores.
Lumia 950 XL has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher number of pixels per inch of display and a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A32 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and a larger aperture.
Galaxy A32 has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Lumia 950 XL, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a way better battery performance than Lumia 950 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3340mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.