Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Vivo |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 325.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.37 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than Lumia 950 XL, having a general score of 77.8 against 75. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's design is notably newer and much thinner than the Lumia 950 XL's, but it's also noticeably heavier. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 operating system, while Lumia 950 XL counts with Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
The Lumia 950 XL has a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores and 13 GB lesser RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a more vivid screen than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because although it has a quite inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a really larger display and a better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a much better 50 MP resolution camera, a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low light situations, a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a much better video quality. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Lumia 950 XL, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Microsoft Lumia 950 XL. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.