Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Microsoft Lumia 950, getting an 83.7 score against 74.1. LG V50 ThinQ works with Android 10 OS, and Microsoft Lumia 950 counts with Windows 10 Mobile OS. Even though LG V50 ThinQ is a lot newer than Microsoft Lumia 950, it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Microsoft Lumia 950 has just a bit better looking display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount per display inch. LG V50 ThinQ has a better performing CPU than Lumia 950, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ's camera is just as good as the camera in Microsoft Lumia 950, because although the LG V50 ThinQ has a lot worse resolution camera, a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and pictures and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger aperture.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Lumia 950, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. LG V50 ThinQ features superior battery life than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.