Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a general score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than the Lumia 950's general score of 74.1. The Motorola DROID Turbo is an older, much thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than Lumia 950. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with Android 4.4.4 operating system, and Lumia 950 works with Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a quite superior hardware performance than Lumia 950, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has an extra GPU and a greater number of cores. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit more vivid display than Lumia 950. Both have a better count of pixels per display inch, a same size screen and the same exact 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Lumia 950 has a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 200 GB. The Lumia 950 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations.
Motorola DROID Turbo has better battery lifetime than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a 30 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola DROID Turbo is also by far the cheapest, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.