Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2015-10-06 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is much better than Microsoft Lumia 950's 74.1 score. Although Galaxy A80 is incredibly newer than Microsoft Lumia 950, it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a superior CPU than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Lumia 950 has a way better looking screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen. Galaxy A80 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Lumia 950, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A80 has a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Lumia 950, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A80 has better battery lifetime than Lumia 950, because it has a 23% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.