Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Vivo |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 309.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.19 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Microsoft Lumia 950, having a general score of 77.8 against 74.1. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 OS, while Microsoft Lumia 950 comes with Windows 10 Mobile OS. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is notably newer and much thinner than Microsoft Lumia 950's, although it's also notably heavier.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Lumia 950, because although it has much lesser pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a way bigger display. Lumia 950 features a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 7 lesser processing cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Lumia 950, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Lumia 950, because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and video, a much bigger sensor and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery life than Lumia 950, because it has a 90% more battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Microsoft Lumia 950, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Microsoft Lumia 950. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Microsoft Lumia 950, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.