Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Vivo |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has an overall score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the Lumia 950's general score of 74.1. The vivo X60 Pro is a way newer and a little thinner cellphone than Lumia 950, but it is heavier. Vivo X60 Pro comes with Android 11 OS, and Lumia 950 has Windows 10 Mobile OS. Microsoft Lumia 950 has a better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The vivo X60 Pro features a much better performing processor than Microsoft Lumia 950, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. Vivo X60 Pro has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Lumia 950, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The vivo X60 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Microsoft Lumia 950, and although they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Lumia 950, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.