Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a general score of 85.3 against 76.4. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 design is notably newer and much thinner, but also much heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has just a bit better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores. Motorola Droid Turbo has a better screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a much smaller display and a little bit lower 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each inch of display.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a camera with a way lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a bit longer battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Microsoft Surface Duo 2, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.