Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, with an 85.3 score against 77.9. Even though the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a lot heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo, it's much thinner and a lot newer. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has the older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. Motorola DROID Turbo features a more vivid screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4449mAh battery size.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.