Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 540.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a general score of 85.3, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, Microsoft Surface Duo 2's body is noticeably older, notably heavier and somewhat thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro. These phones include Android operating system, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density, a little higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a really brighter screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much higher resolution back facing camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has greater battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 28 percent bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.