Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-10 | 2018-08-29 |
| 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.82 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Glacier | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 540.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2700 x 1800 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 11.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3577mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is slightly better than Microsoft Surface Duo's 78.8 global score. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's body is a lot lighter than Microsoft Surface Duo, but it is way thicker and was released many years before. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Microsoft Surface Duo, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little sharper screen than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2246 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior camera than Microsoft Surface Duo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a bigger camera aperture and a more megapixels camera.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3577mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.