Compare phones
Motorola Admiral
XT603Nokia N9
16 GBN9-00
| Global Score | |
| 52.3 | 54.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 2.3 | MeeGo |
| 2011-10-20 | 2011-06-21 |
| 4.68 x 2.44 x 0.48 inches | 4.58 x 2.41 x 0.48 inches |
| 4.71 ounces | 4.76 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 140.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 3.9 inches |
| 480 x 640 pixels (VGA) | 480 x 854 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 258 pixels per inch | 251 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset | -- |
| Single-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| GPU | PowerVR SGX530 (200 MHz) GPU |
| 7.56 | 7.56 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 4.4 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 7.59 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 3.2 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1450mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 79 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | 384 hours standby time 11 hours talk time |
| 3.76 | 3.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 2.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia N9 is a bit better than Motorola Admiral, getting a score of 54.6 against 52.3. Nokia N9's design has the same thickness than Motorola Admiral, but it is just a little bit heavier. Nokia N9 works with MeeGo operating system, while Motorola Admiral comes with Android 2.3 operating system.
The Nokia N9 counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the processing unit in Motorola Admiral, and although the Nokia N9 has an extra graphics processing unit and 512 MB more RAM, they both have 1 processing cores. Nokia N9 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Admiral, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better 854 x 480 resolution and a larger display.
The Nokia N9 counts with more memory for apps and games than Motorola Admiral, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 16 GB internal storage. The Nokia N9 captures much better videos and photos than Motorola Admiral, and although they both have the same (HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Nokia N9 also has a back facing camera with a way higher 8 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola Admiral has greater battery performance than Nokia N9, because it has 1860mAh of battery capacity instead of 1450mAh.
The Nokia N9 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.