Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 2.3.5, 2.3.4 | Android 10 |
| 2011-10-11 | 2020-05-05 |
| 4.96 x 2.59 x 0.40 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.18 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1785mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 382 hours standby time 8.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is a lot better than Motorola ATRIX 2's 58.8 global score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while Motorola ATRIX 2 has Android 2.3.5. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is a lot newer and somewhat thinner, but also incredibly heavier than Motorola ATRIX 2.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola ATRIX 2, because it has a lot greater pixel number per inch of screen, a lot better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a lot larger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola ATRIX 2, because it has 56 GB more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a more powerful CPU than Motorola ATRIX 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a way better battery life than Motorola ATRIX 2, because it has a 181% bigger battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Motorola ATRIX 2, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.