Compare phones
Motorola ATRIX 4G
MB860Motorola Moto E (2015)
XT1511XT1511
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 63.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 2.3.6, 2.3.4, 2.2 | Android 5.0 |
| 2011-01-05 | 2015-02-25 |
| 4.64 x 2.50 x 0.43 inches | 5.11 x 2.63 x 0.48 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 140.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 275 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.65 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.5 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1930mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2390mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 264 hours standby time 8.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.84 | 4.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto E (2015) has a global score of 63.4, which is a little bit better than Motorola ATRIX 4G's general score of 57.9. Even though the Motorola Moto E (2015) is way newer than the Motorola ATRIX 4G, it is thicker and just a little heavier. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but the Motorola Moto E (2015) has the newer 5.0 version and Motorola ATRIX 4G has Android 2.3.6 version, providing the user some nice extra features and some performance improvements.
Motorola Moto E (2015) counts with a little sharper display than Motorola ATRIX 4G, because although it has a little inferior pixel count in each display inch, and they both have exactly the same 960 x 540 resolution, the Motorola Moto E (2015) also counts with a quite larger display. Motorola Moto E (2015) features a superior processing unit than Motorola ATRIX 4G, and although they both have 1 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto E (2015) also has more cores, an additional GPU and a 64-bit CPU.
Motorola Moto E (2015) features just a bit better camera than Motorola ATRIX 4G, and although they both have the same 1280x720 (HD) video definition, a back camera with a 5 mega-pixels resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto E (2015) also has a lot larger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola ATRIX 4G counts with a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Moto E (2015), and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 32 GB, the Motorola ATRIX 4G also has 16 GB internal memory. The Motorola Moto E (2015) counts with greater battery life than Motorola ATRIX 4G, because it has a 2390mAh battery capacity instead of 1930mAh.
Moto E (2015) not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.