Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 63.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 2.3.6, 2.3.4, 2.2 | Android 10 |
| 2011-01-05 | 2020-05-29 |
| 4.64 x 2.50 x 0.43 inches | 5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Tempered blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 110.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 275 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset | MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | PowerVR GE8300 GPU |
| 7.65 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1930mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 264 hours standby time 8.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia C2 Tava has a global score of 63.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola ATRIX 4G's global score of 57.9. The Nokia C2 Tava design is way newer and thinner, but way heavier than the Motorola ATRIX 4G. These phones have Android OS, but Nokia C2 Tava has 10 version and Motorola ATRIX 4G has Android 2.3.6.
The Motorola ATRIX 4G has a little sharper screen than Nokia C2 Tava, although it has a lot lower 960 x 540 pixels resolution, a quite lower pixel density and a much smaller display. Nokia C2 Tava counts with a superior processing unit than Motorola ATRIX 4G, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
Nokia C2 Tava has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola ATRIX 4G, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB and 32 GB internal storage. The Nokia C2 Tava features a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola ATRIX 4G, because it has a 55% larger battery capacity.
Nokia C2 Tava's camera is very similar to the Motorola ATRIX 4G one, although the Nokia C2 Tava also has a much higher video quality and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Nokia C2 Tava is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.