Search


Compare phones

Global Score
57.960.9
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
Android 2.3.6, 2.3.4, 2.2Android 4.1.2, 4.1.1
2011-01-052012-10-11
4.64 x 2.50 x 0.43 inches4.78 x 2.48 x 0.39 inches
4.76 ounces4.23 ounces
--Blue and White
Scratch-Resistant GlassScratch-Resistant Glass
$ 170.00$ 145.00
Display / Screen
4 inches4 inches
540 x 960 pixels 480 x 800 pixels
--Super AMOLED
275 pixels per inch233 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchCapacitive, Multi-touch
7.47.6
Performance
NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipsetSTE U8420 chipset
Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor
1 GB RAM1 GB RAM
Yes GPUARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU
7.657.83
Storage
16 GB internal memory16 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
5.725.72
Camera
5.00 MP + 0.30 MP5.00 MP + 0.30 MP
f/2.80 aperture--
1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution
7.486.71
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA
SIMSIM
3.54.3
Battery Life
1930mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
264 hours standby time
8.8 hours talk time
460 hours standby time
14.2 hours talk time
3.843.28
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 4.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Samsung Galaxy S III mini is a bit better than Motorola ATRIX 4G, getting a 60.9 score against 57.9. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S III mini has a more recent 4.1.2 version and Motorola ATRIX 4G has Android 2.3.6 version, so it counts with some additional features. Samsung Galaxy S III mini is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than Motorola ATRIX 4G.

Galaxy S III mini has a bit better processing unit than Motorola ATRIX 4G, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores, the Galaxy S III mini also has an additional graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy S III mini features a bit better looking screen than Motorola ATRIX 4G, although it has a bit lower 800 x 480 pixels resolution and a little bit inferior number of pixels per screen inch, they both have a display with the same size.

Samsung Galaxy S III mini features as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the Motorola ATRIX 4G, both of them have exactly the same 16 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 32 GB. Motorola ATRIX 4G has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III mini, because it has 1930mAh of battery capacity against 1500mAh.

The Motorola ATRIX 4G takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III mini. Both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 1280x720 (HD) video resolution and a 5 megapixels resolution back facing camera.

Galaxy S III mini is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making this phone a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.