Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.6, 2.3.4, 2.2 | -- |
| 2011-01-05 | 2017-04-21 |
| 4.64 x 2.50 x 0.43 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 275 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1930mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 264 hours standby time 8.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is a lot better than the Motorola ATRIX 4G, with a general score of 81.7 against 57.9. Although Galaxy S8 is heavier than Motorola ATRIX 4G, it's a lot thinner and way newer. The Galaxy S8 features a lot better processing power than Motorola ATRIX 4G, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM.
The Galaxy S8 counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola ATRIX 4G, because it has a much higher 1440 x 2960 resolution, a much bigger screen and a lot better screen density. Samsung Galaxy S8 has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Motorola ATRIX 4G, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Galaxy S8 has a very superior camera than Motorola ATRIX 4G, because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher 12 mega pixels resolution, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot bigger aperture for better images and video in low light environments. Samsung Galaxy S8 features a very superior battery duration than Motorola ATRIX 4G, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 1930mAh.
Galaxy S8 is a bit more expensive than the Motorola ATRIX 4G, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.