Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 2.1, 1.5 | -- |
| 2010-01-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.25 x 2.09 x 0.60 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 186 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm MSM7200A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Single-Core 528 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.66 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 262,14 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (25 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 315 hours standby time 5.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Compass | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is much better than Motorola BACKFLIP's general score of 45.5. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is much newer and incredibly thinner than Motorola BACKFLIP's, although it's way heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better performance than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has 7 more cores and 3,75 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a lot better display than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has a lot larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and much more pixels per display inch. Google Pixel 3 XL takes way better pictures and videos than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola BACKFLIP, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 3 XL has a way better battery duration than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.