Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 2.1, 1.5 | -- |
| 2010-01-06 | 2017-06-29 |
| 4.25 x 2.09 x 0.60 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 186 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm MSM7200A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Single-Core 528 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.66 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 262,14 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 2.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| 320 x 240 (25 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 315 hours standby time 5.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Compass | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Play is way better than the Motorola BACKFLIP, with a overall score of 77.4 against 45.5. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play construction is newer and thinner than Motorola BACKFLIP's, although it is also just a little bit heavier. The Moto Z2 Play features a way better screen than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has a way better 1080 x 1920 resolution, a much larger screen and much more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a way better hardware performance than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster). Moto Z2 Play features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has 63,74 GB more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z2 Play has a much better battery lifetime than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 1400mAh. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play shoots a lot better videos and photos than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has a way more mega pixels back camera and a much better video definition.
The Moto Z2 Play costs a bit more money than the Motorola BACKFLIP, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.