Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.1, 1.5 | -- |
| 2010-01-06 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.25 x 2.09 x 0.60 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 186 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm MSM7200A chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Single-Core 528 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.66 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 262,14 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (25 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 315 hours standby time 5.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Compass | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is way better than the Motorola BACKFLIP, getting an 83.8 score against 45.5. Galaxy A50's body is a lot newer and way thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Motorola BACKFLIP. Galaxy A50 features a much better screen than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has a much larger screen, a lot greater pixels number per display inch and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has more CPU cores and more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much better camera than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has a way better resolution back facing camera and a lot better (Full HD) video quality.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50 features a very superior battery life than Motorola BACKFLIP, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a little more than Motorola BACKFLIP, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.