Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.7 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Cricket |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| 4.09 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 2.51 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| 101 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 340 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
Comparison review
Motorola C168 has a general score of 28.7, which is slightly better than the Cricket CAPTR's 27.9 global score. The Motorola C168 is a lighter and noticeably thinner device than Cricket CAPTR. Cricket CAPTR counts with a CPU that's just as good as the processing unit in Motorola C168, both have 0 cores.
The Cricket CAPTR counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola C168, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 160 x 128 pixels and a bit better pixel density. Cricket CAPTR shoots a lot better photos and videos than Motorola C168. The Motorola C168 and the Cricket CAPTR both have really similar storage capacity to install games and applications.
Motorola C168 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a 1000mAh battery size.
Motorola C168 costs exactly the same than the Cricket CAPTR, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.