Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.7 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Cricket |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| 4.09 x 1.81 x 0.55 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 2.51 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| 101 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.2 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 340 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
Comparison review
Motorola C168i is just a bit better than the Cricket CAPTR, with a global score of 28.7 against 27.9. The Motorola C168i design is much thinner and lighter than the Cricket CAPTR. Cricket CAPTR counts with a little sharper display than Motorola C168i, because it has a little higher number of pixels in each inch of display and a little higher resolution of 160 x 128.
The Cricket CAPTR's processing unit is just as good as the Motorola C168i one, they have 0 cores. The Cricket CAPTR's memory capacity for apps and games is very similar to the Motorola C168i one. The Cricket CAPTR counts with a greater camera than Motorola C168i. Motorola C168i features just a bit longer battery duration than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a 1000mAh battery size against 920mAh.
The Motorola C168i costs the same than the Cricket CAPTR, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.