Compare phones
Motorola CHARM
MB502, ME502| Global Score | |
| 44 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 2.1 | -- |
| 2010-07-07 | 2017-10-19 |
| 3.87 x 2.65 x 0.45 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Single-Core 600 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.75 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1170mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 267 hours standby time 6.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a general score of 82.5, which is way better than Motorola CHARM's 44 general score. Google Pixel 2 XL's construction is a lot newer and extremely thinner than the Motorola CHARM's, but it's also way heavier. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a very superior processor than Motorola CHARM, because it has a higher number of cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has an incredibly better screen than Motorola CHARM, because it has a way larger display, a lot higher screen pixels density and a much higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola CHARM, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola CHARM, because it has a 201% bigger battery capacity. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a lot better camera than Motorola CHARM, because it has a way more MP camera.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 2 XL is also the cheapest, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.