Compare phones
Motorola CHARM
MB502, ME502| Global Score | |
| 44 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 2.1 | -- |
| 2010-07-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 3.87 x 2.65 x 0.45 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Single-Core 600 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.75 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1170mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 267 hours standby time 6.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is much better than the Motorola CHARM's global score of 44. The Google Pixel 3 is a incredibly newer and a lot thinner phone than Motorola CHARM, but it is way heavier. Google Pixel 3 features a much better looking display than Motorola CHARM, because it has a much bigger screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a way higher display pixels density.
Google Pixel 3 features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola CHARM, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 3 counts with a lot better performance than Motorola CHARM, because it has a larger number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 captures greater videos and photos than Motorola CHARM, because it has a much more megapixels camera in the back. Google Pixel 3 has a much longer battery life than Motorola CHARM, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity against 1170mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 costs a little more than the Motorola CHARM, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.