Compare phones
Motorola CHARM
MB502, ME502Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 44 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 2.1 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2010-07-07 | 2014-10-28 |
| 3.87 x 2.65 x 0.45 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Gray and Red |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Single-Core 600 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.75 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1170mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 267 hours standby time 6.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 76.4, which is way better than Motorola CHARM's 44 global score. Although the Motorola DROID Turbo is extremely heavier than Motorola CHARM, it's just a bit thinner and also extremely newer. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version while Motorola CHARM has Android 2.1 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola CHARM, because it has a higher number of faster cores and an extra GPU. Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better screen than Motorola CHARM, because it has a way larger display, much more pixels per inch of display and a way higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola CHARM, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola CHARM, because it has a 3900mAh battery size against 1170mAh.
Motorola DROID Turbo takes way better videos and photos than Motorola CHARM, because it has a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Motorola DROID Turbo costs a bit more than the Motorola CHARM, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.