Compare phones
Motorola CHARM
MB502, ME502Nokia Lumia 510
Global| Global Score | |
| 44 | 48.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 2.1 | Windows Phone 7.5 Mango |
| 2010-07-07 | 2012-10-23 |
| 3.87 x 2.65 x 0.45 inches | 4.75 x 2.56 x 0.45 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 4.55 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 155.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 4 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 480 x 800 pixels |
| TFT | LCD |
| 143 pixels per inch | 233 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A chipset |
| Single-Core 600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 800 MHz) processor |
| -- | 256 MB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU |
| 6.75 | 7.2 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.42 | 2.5 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.40 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 5.06 | 6.93 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.5 | 3.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1170mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 267 hours standby time 6.8 hours talk time | 739 hours standby time 6.2 hours talk time |
| 2.8 | 3.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Lumia 510 is a bit better than the Motorola CHARM, getting a 48.2 score against 44. Lumia 510 counts with Windows Phone 7.5 Mango operating system, while Motorola CHARM works with Android 2.1 operating system. Lumia 510 is a heavier phone than Motorola CHARM, but both are equally thin. Nokia Lumia 510 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola CHARM, and although they both have 1 cores, the Nokia Lumia 510 also has a graphics co-processor.
Nokia Lumia 510 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola CHARM, because it has a much better 800 x 480 pixels resolution, a way larger screen and much more pixels per inch in the display. Lumia 510 counts with a little bit more memory to install games and applications than Motorola CHARM, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Lumia 510 has a very superior camera than Motorola CHARM, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels. The Lumia 510 features a little better battery performance than Motorola CHARM, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
The Nokia Lumia 510 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.