Compare phones
Motorola CHARM
MB502, ME502| Global Score | |
| 44 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.1 | -- |
| 2010-07-07 | 2018-03-16 |
| 3.87 x 2.65 x 0.45 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Single-Core 600 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.75 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1170mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 267 hours standby time 6.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is much better than Motorola CHARM, having an 83.3 score against 44. Galaxy S9 is a newer and a lot thinner device than Motorola CHARM, but it is also a lot heavier. Samsung Galaxy S9 has an incredibly better screen than Motorola CHARM, because it has a lot better pixels count per display inch, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a much larger screen.
Galaxy S9 features much more memory for games and applications than Motorola CHARM, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 400 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a really superior performance than Motorola CHARM, because it has a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy S9 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola CHARM, because it has a back camera with lot more MP. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much better battery performance than Motorola CHARM, because it has a 156% larger battery size.
Galaxy S9 costs a little more than the Motorola CHARM, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.