Compare phones
Motorola CHARM
MB502, ME502| Global Score | |
| 44 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 2.1 | Android 10 |
| 2010-07-07 | 2020-11-27 |
| 3.87 x 2.65 x 0.45 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 143 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Single-Core 600 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.75 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.06 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1170mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 267 hours standby time 6.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 is way better than Motorola CHARM, getting a 78.2 score against 44. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco M3 has a more recent 10 version and Motorola CHARM has Android 2.1 version, giving you a couple additional features and increased performance. Even though Xiaomi Poco M3 is noticeably heavier than the Motorola CHARM, it's thinner and extremely newer.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much sharper display than Motorola CHARM, because it has a much bigger screen, a lot higher screen pixels density and a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola CHARM, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a lot better processing power than Motorola CHARM, because it has more cores. Xiaomi Poco M3 features a greater camera than Motorola CHARM, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution. The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola CHARM, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Xiaomi Poco M3 is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.