Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 1.5 | Android 4.0 |
| 2010-02-15 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.59 x 2.34 x 0.48 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.36 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 186 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Yes | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm MSM7200A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Single-Core 528 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 6.66 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 262,14 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.12 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.3 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1420mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 500 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.2 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is way better than Motorola Cliq XT, getting a overall score of 71.5 against 46. Galaxy S III Cricket's construction is notably thinner but just a little heavier than Motorola Cliq XT. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S III Cricket has a more recent 4.0 version while Motorola Cliq XT has Android 1.5 version, so it gives some extra features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a way better performance than Motorola Cliq XT, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory, a higher number of cores and a GPU. The Galaxy S III Cricket has an incredibly better screen than Motorola Cliq XT, because it has a much better resolution of 1280 x 720px, a much higher display pixels density and a way larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a way better camera than Motorola Cliq XT, because it has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Cliq XT, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 64 GB.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Cliq XT, because it has a 2100mAh battery capacity instead of 1420mAh.
Galaxy S III Cricket costs the same than Motorola Cliq XT.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.