Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-17 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola Defy (2021), having an 83.7 score against 77.2. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version while Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11 version. Although the LG V50 ThinQ is way older than Motorola Defy (2021), it's construction is a lot lighter and notably thinner.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit faster processor than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a way higher display pixel density.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much greater storage for applications and games than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. The Motorola Defy (2021) has a little bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Defy (2021) also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Defy (2021) has better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.