Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2021-06-17 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is much better than the Motorola Defy (2021)'s score of 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G body is a lot thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Defy (2021), even though it was released just 22 months before. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android operating system, while Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11 operating system.
Galaxy A90 5G has just a little better performance than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a greater count of pixels per inch of display, a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite bigger display.
The Galaxy A90 5G takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more internal storage capacity. Motorola Defy (2021) counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.