Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-06-17 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.18 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Forged Green | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola Defy (2021), with an 81 score against 77.2. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is an extremely older cellphone than Motorola Defy (2021), but it is somewhat lighter and notably thinner anyway. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11 version, giving lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a higher display density. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a processor that is just as good as Motorola Defy (2021)'s CPU, and although the Galaxy C9 Pro has 2 GB more RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Motorola Defy (2021) shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments, a lot better resolution back camera and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Motorola Defy (2021) has slightly more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Defy (2021) features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.