Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.3, 2.2 | -- |
| 2010-08-10 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.58 x 2.38 x 0.54 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 265 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP3630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX530 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 3.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 315 hours standby time 9.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is much better than Motorola DROID 2's 53.5 overall score. The Galaxy S9 is a newer phone, and it is also a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola DROID 2. The Galaxy S9 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola DROID 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3,5 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Galaxy S9 counts with a sharper screen than Motorola DROID 2, because it has a way better pixels amount per inch in the screen, a way larger screen and a much better 1440 x 2960px resolution. The Galaxy S9 shoots way better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID 2, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much better 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy S9 features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID 2, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 400 GB and 64 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID 2, because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 1400mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S9 is also the cheapest one, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.