Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-29 |
| 4.85 x 2.52 x 0.51 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 330.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 275 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP 4430 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 9.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola DROID 3's score of 56.5. The Galaxy A51 5G is a incredibly thinner but just a little bit heavier device than the Motorola DROID 3. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version while Motorola DROID 3 has Android 2.3.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a superior processor than Motorola DROID 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 5,5 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. Galaxy A51 5G features a slightly better screen than Motorola DROID 3, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a way larger display and a better screen pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a greater camera than Motorola DROID 3, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back camera. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID 3, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Motorola DROID 3, because it has a 192% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a bit more expensive than the Motorola DROID 3, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.