Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.3 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-16 |
| 4.85 x 2.52 x 0.51 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 330.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 275 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP 4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time 9.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is way better than Motorola DROID 3's general score of 56.5. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version and Motorola DROID 3 has Android 2.3 version. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a extremely thinner but just a little heavier cellphone than Motorola DROID 3.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a way better processing power than Motorola DROID 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a more vivid display than Motorola DROID 3, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels, a lot larger display and a way greater number of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games than Motorola DROID 3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy S10 5G has a much better battery performance than Motorola DROID 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 1540mAh.
Galaxy S10 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola DROID 3, because it has a much more mega pixels back camera and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy S10 5G is a bit more expensive than Motorola DROID 3, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.