Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 2.3.5 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-01-09 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.00 x 2.65 x 0.50 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 255.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 275 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1785mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 204 hours standby time 12.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is way better than the Motorola Droid 4, having a overall score of 83.7 against 62. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Motorola Droid 4 has Android 4.1.2. The LG V50 ThinQ design is incredibly newer and thinner, but a bit heavier than Motorola Droid 4.
LG V50 ThinQ features a better performing CPU than Motorola Droid 4, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Droid 4, because it has a lot more pixels per display inch, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a really bigger screen.
LG V50 ThinQ has a superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Droid 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ shoots a lot better photos and videos than Motorola Droid 4, because it has a lot bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a way better battery duration than Motorola Droid 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.