Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.2, 2.1, 2.0 | -- |
| 2009-10-28 | 2016-03-11 |
| 4.56 x 2.36 x 0.54 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 265 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP3430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX530 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.93 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 720 x 480 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 270 hours standby time 6.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is a lot better than the Motorola Droid, with a general score of 79.5 against 47.5. The Galaxy S7 is a way newer phone, and it's also notably thinner and lighter than Motorola Droid. The Galaxy S7 has an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Droid, because it has a lot higher pixels count per screen inch, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a lot larger screen.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a much better performance than Motorola Droid, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores and more RAM memory. The Galaxy S7 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Droid, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher 12 mega pixels resolution and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 200 GB. Samsung Galaxy S7 has a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Droid, because it has a 114% more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 costs a bit more than Motorola Droid, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.