Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 64.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2012-09-05 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.19 x 2.67 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2530mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 286 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 is much better than the Motorola DROID RAZR HD, having a 77.6 score against 64.6. The Motorola Moto Z3 is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Motorola DROID RAZR HD, although it is also just a little heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola Moto Z3 has 9.0 Pie version and Motorola DROID RAZR HD has Android 4.4.2.
Moto Z3 features a superior performance than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 3 GB more RAM. Motorola DROID RAZR HD features a bit sharper screen than Moto Z3, although it has a really smaller display, a lot worse 1280 x 720 resolution and a just a little lower pixel density.
The Moto Z3 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because it has 48 GB more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z3 shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because it has a bigger aperture, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much higher 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Moto Z3 features superior battery performance than Motorola DROID RAZR HD, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Moto Z3 is also cheaper, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.