Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2015-10-29 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 is better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with an 85 score against 75.4. The Apple iPhone 8 is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The iPhone 8 has a better processor than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has lesser CPU cores (but faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit sharper display than iPhone 8, because it has a lot better display pixels density, a quite bigger display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The iPhone 8 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features more memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 8, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 3760mAh battery size against 1821mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save some money, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.