Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2015-10-29 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max has an overall score of 84.5, which is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 score. The Apple iPhone XS Max body is newer and somewhat thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, but it is somewhat heavier. IPhone XS Max counts with a better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a higher amount of RAM.
Apple iPhone XS Max features a little more vivid display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a bit worse 1242 x 2688 resolution and a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a very superior storage for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
IPhone XS Max takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has just a little better battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3760mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save some money, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.