Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-10-29 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a overall score of 81.6 against 75.4. The Google Pixel 2 body is newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Google Pixel 2 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a little bigger screen, a just a little better count of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Google Pixel 2's camera is very similar to the camera in Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although the Google Pixel 2 has a lot worse 12.2 MP resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.