Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2015-10-29 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having a overall score of 77 against 75.4. The LG V20 design is newer and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, although it is also just a little bit heavier. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit better screen than LG V20, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also counts with a little higher screen pixels density. LG V20 has as much memory to install applications and games as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 one, they have a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and equal 64 GB internal storage.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features just a little bit longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 3760mAh battery size against 3200mAh. The LG V20 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a much worse 16 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG V20 is also the cheapest one, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.